Tuesday 18 December 2018

Driver wages rise to counter skills shortage

27driverThe supply of truck drivers to the UK transport industry is improving thanks to higher wages, but questions are being raised by the Freight Transport Association and others about the impact of Brexit on the recruitment and retention of staff from the European Union.

An independent report, Driver Shortage: Issues and Trends, commissioned by the Freight Transport Association from researchers RepGraph Ltd, calculates that the shortfall between the number of registered large goods vehicles and the number of qualified drivers is now 34,567, back to what the FTA describes as the ‘pre-crisis’ level of 2012.

The much-needed increases in drivers’ wages – now said to be running at twice average inflation – is acknowledged as a positive force, although much of the improvement in earnings is attributed to overtime and bonuses, indicating that a ‘long hours’ culture is still prevalent in the industry.

The FTA says it will publish new editions of the report every six months.

There is still no room for complacency: the FTA points out that only 530 individuals giving their occupation as truck driver were registered as unemployed in August, which is traditionally a slack time for goods transport. This leaves little surplus capacity as demand for transport services rises towards the end of the year.

As well as uncertainty over Brexit, FTA highlighted poor roadside facilities for drivers and the high cost of licence acquisition as having negative impacts on recruitment and retention.

FTA deputy chief executive James Hookham said: “The report highlights the industry’s reliance on EU nationals, with more than 30,000 – 10 per cent of the entire driver workforce – currently employed in the UK.

“The uncertainty about their employment rights and status once Britain leaves the EU is a major concern for businesses. We urge the government to ensure its Brexit negotiations afford special status to logistics and allow for this employment to continue so that the industry is not hit by another driver shortage crisis.

“We also need better roadside facilities – especially if we are going to attract more women into the industry – and more help from government with the cost of acquiring a vocational licence, which is often cited as a barrier to recruitment.”

The report shows the average age of newly-qualified drivers is 34 (compared with 48 for the overall driver population) meaning over half of those who took an LGV driving test last year were under the age of 35. Women have a better pass rate than men.

Independent transport analyst Kirsten Tisdale, who has previously highlighted an abundance of qualified drivers working in other occupations for reasons mostly linked to pay and conditions, has said that Brexit may offer an opportunity to make the industry more attractive by reforming drivers’ hours regulations.

“Before EU drivers’ hours regulations came along, the Transport Act of 1968 restricted the driver’s working day to 12.5 hours through what was referred to as ‘spreadover,’” she recalled.

“And that was the case up until the amendments in 1986, which abolished the 1968 limits on driver duty when a driver was covered by EC rules – the new provisions on rest periods within the EC rules were seen as effectively limiting the hours for which a driver could be on duty.

“In 2005 the Working Time Directive was applied to the road transport industry, with the very weak interpretation of periods of availability (PoAs) that was adopted in the UK. And that weak interpretation was accompanied by a casual approach to its use, in many ways turning what should have been protective legislation into just another administrative task.

“However, until 2007, any reduction in daily rest from 11 to 9 hours still had to be made up by the end of the following week. After EC regulation 561/2006 was introduced in April 2007, no rest compensation was required.

“Could a return to the past regime be helpful?” she asked.

“Certainly pay would need to reflect the change as drivers would still have the same rent to pay and families to feed. It would not be an easy pill for industry to swallow.

“But I’m interested in how much could be made up for by efficiencies: reducing PoAs, which are often effectively an admission of wasted driver time. Would limiting the length of the working day back to the 12.5 hour spreadover help to make the job more attractive?

“That change in April 2007 means that each and every week can include three 15-hour days. And after each of those 15-hour days, the driver needs to travel home, eat and say goodnight, before sleeping for a few hours and then getting up again …quite probably at what I’ve seen described as stupid o’clock.

“Would you want to work those hours?”

2 comments

  1. Steve W says:

    It’s all very well for the industry to come up with a set of statistics that says, “Problem solved, back to normal chaps.”

    We all know the famous quote about statistics, don’t we? ‘Lies, damned lies and…’ Oh yeah, those.

    I welcome Ms Tisdale’s work on the issues affecting our industry. She seems to be rather a lone voice in seeking to understand not just the transport industry and the problems in recruitment and retention it faces, but how it fits in with our society as a whole and our modern ways of living and working. Ways which have changed massively within a very short space of time.

    Try reading State Of The Nation 2016: Social Mobility In Great Britain from the Social Mobility Commission. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/569410/Social_Mobility_Commission_2016_REPORT_WEB__1__.pdf

    What, you might wonder, is the relevance to the transport industry?

    Well, everything. If each generation entering the workforce is less well-off than it’s predecessor, then where the Hell are prospective new drivers going to find £3k-£4k to fund their LGV training? People who might be working currently as van drivers, flt drivers, warehouse workers. Young men and women with a bit about themselves and the ambition and drive to want to progress in this industry.

    They can’t even pay their monthly bills. They don’t have ANY savings.

    Employers don’t want to pay those training costs. They don’t even want to hire newbies. They regard them as too inexperienced, too expensive to insure, too risky in terms of damage. And yet on the other hand, without wanting to jump on board the xenophobia bus, I’d like to point out they seem perfectly happy to hire EU drivers who appear to have got their licences out of a box of cornflakes.

    When are the powers that be going to grasp the nettle and say, “If you want to drive an LGV in this country as a UK based driver, you will have to pass a UK LGV test for the class of vehicle you say you can drive.”?

    Why not? 44 tonnes of moving metal is a killing machine. We don’t let foreign doctors practice in this country unless they can prove they are competent. The recent case of the young Polish driver on the M4 fiddling about on his phone and wiping out four members of the same family graphically shows the stakes involved. I am not anti-EU drivers, very definitely I am not, but I think we all know the standard covers the whole spectrum from excellent to ‘give me those keys, you’re going nowhere, sunshine’.

    EU drivers have become a replacement for UK drivers, not an addition. The House of Commons recent report says so. What we are deaing with is the de-skilling of the British economy. The idea of aspiration is dead. Of pulling yourself up by your own hard work. Forget it. It’s impossible when the game is rigged so badly against you.

    I count myself as lucky. I’d hate to be young now.
    Regards,
    Steve

    • 100% spot on. They don’t want to invest in the youth for decent qualifications; they never have. Paying for HGV training and CPC is very expensive and as suggested, most people struggle to pay ever rising bills, let along save!

Leave a comment

Comment form

All fields marked (*) are required